![]() Each conroi contained around 15-30 knights, though it could be considerably less. The tactical building block of the Anglo-Norman heavy cavalry was a unit called a conroi. Tangentially, this means that we know rather more about the (often) aristocratic cavalryman than we do about the foot soldier. One is that almost all of our sources are weighted very heavily towards the deeds of the great and the glorious, with much less emphasis on the routine of military organization and soldier life. I'd like to make a few cautionary notes first. But I'd like to examine the issue in a more focused, detailed manner by concentrating on one place in a fairly limited time frame: Anglo-Norman armies of the late 11th-12th centuries. Now, /u/MartinGreywolf has done a very serviceable job of providing an overview of the general mechanics of raising and organizing a generic medieval army. Mounted archers were dragoons, essentially, riding to battle and dismounting to fight but men-at-arms (which I'll be calling knights, for reasons that don't bear going into) could fight on horseback or afoot. ![]() I think he could have been clearer, but he is saying, essentially, that mounted troops were not necessarily purely infantry or cavalry in role, but could act as either as the situation called for. I feel you're misunderstanding /u/MI13 's answer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |